Overview
A nationally recognized U.S.-based Am Law 200 firm with more than 300 attorneys turned to QorusDocs to help drive proposal management efficiency and consistency. The company has a strong focus on litigation across industries including insurance, healthcare, financial services, and real estate. The firm’s focus is on building long-term collaborative relationships, and it is ranked among the nation’s most collaborative law firms.
With a centralized marketing and business development team supporting firm-wide pursuits, the pressure is constant. Every proposal must be accurate, tailored, and turned around quickly, often with input from multiple stakeholders.
The Challenge: When Growth Exposes Gaps
As the firm’s proposal volume grew, the existing process began to show its limits.
Content and experience data lived in too many places: spreadsheets, documents, and internal systems that didn’t always connect. While they had a strong proposal template, there was no consistent way to manage, surface, or reuse the firm’s wealth of knowledge.
Teams often found themselves starting from scratch or relying on memory to track down the right materials. “There was no technology driving the collection of any of the experience. It was all in spreadsheets, making it a bit of a mess to find needed materials,” recalls the Director of Marketing and Business Development.
A More Complex Type of Work
At the same time, the nature of proposals was shifting. Rather than panel submissions, more requests were tied to specific bits of litigation for existing clients. Each one required a tailored response, tighter turnaround times, and detailed input from attorneys. That level of customization raised the stakes. It also made an already manual process even more demanding.
Where Friction Showed Up
The challenges weren’t always obvious at first, but they added up quickly. Experience data was fragmented across systems. Proposal assembly was time-consuming and highly manual. Formatting inconsistencies required careful review before anything could be sent. And much of the process depended on individual team knowledge rather than a shared, reliable content foundation.
As a result, valuable time was spent chasing information, reworking content, and double-checking details instead of focusing on strategy and differentiation.
Put simply, the team needed a better way to bring order and accessibility to their proposal content. All without slowing down an already fast-moving process.